It turns out this meme backfires on itself, as so many do.
I didn't notice at first that it's partly an exhortation to vote for the lesser evil if that will "shift your country as much closer to your ideal as possible." That's pretty funny right there, since Dem loyalists were furiously denouncing the Lesser Evil option so recently. I guess that if you don't actually say the words, it's okay. (But if you say them three times quickly ...?)
The main thing, though, is that the meme amounts to a denunciation of Hillary Rodham Clinton, the DNC, and Democratic partisans. Clinton most of all, though, who put her determination to be President ahead of every other consideration, including the probability that Sanders had a better chance of beating Trump. Her ego, her entitlement, her notion that it was her turn now. I can't think of a better example of "extreme individualism." To ensure that she won the nomination, she played dirty, which some of her fans even thought amusing. It's their party, after all,
one such person wrote, which at least was honest: the party belongs to
its elites and big donors, not to the rank and file who do the scut work
of making phone calls, knocking on doors, driving voters to the polls -- let alone the voters themselves. It's not about you, you individualist with your silly notions of government by the people. Don't believe the fairy tales the elites told you, that elections are meant to choose the best candidate for office. Don't believe the fairy tale drummed into your head since childhood, that American values and ideals have anything to do with the running of our government. It's like the Bible: you're not supposed to take it literally, just have faith in your leaders. Just don't reject the fairy tales during election season, or in the hearing of the real owners of the party.
I guess I'm more or less functional again, after spending a day walking around feeling stunned. I needed to write to find out what I thought about Trump's victory, but I wasn't sure I wanted to know what I thought. I stayed off Facebook yesterday, and timidly logged in today. Before long my liberal friends' reactions had me angry again, and I was back in the fray.
Most notable, as I expected, were Democrats blaming everybody but themselves for the debacle. Paul Krugman was apparently leading the charge, but I hear Rachel Maddow was in there too. If I'm not mistaken, that was one of the tendencies that drove Germany into the hands of the Nazis. Did Germany lose the Great War? It wasn't their fault, it was the Jews and the homosexuals and the Reds stabbing the Fatherland in the back, and women spitting on Our Troops. Did Hillary lose this world-historical election? It wasn't her fault, it was the Bernie Bros and Julian Assange and Jim Comey and all the haters who made voters stay away from the polls.
Most entertaining are the Dems who yell "Don't play the blame game!" when their own attempts to play the blame game are rebutted. We can blame everybody, but don't you dare blame us -- that's being judgmental. We aren't being judgmental, we're just pointing out who stabbed Hillary in the back... Really, they are acting as we were warned Trump's followers would react if he lost. I imagine I'll be seeing a lot more of that.
Meanwhile, what to do? I don't have any answers, but some writers are making sense. There are others, of course, but these two were close to hand. It's alarming that so many liberals and progressives and near-rightists and neoliberals are freaking out, lashing out almost randomly, but that was only to be expected. I can't go on, I'll go on.
Showing posts with label postmortem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label postmortem. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 9, 2016
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Inappropriately Touched By Iowa
Nobody deflates a pompous politician like Whatever It Is I'm Against It. He just demonstrated his filleting skills on Obama's post-holocaust press conference. My favorite:
In other news to complicate the story we're getting on the election, "The conservative Blue Dogs lost half their members, while the Progressive Caucus remains near eighty." Was America trying to send a message to the Democrats?
WHAT THERE IS A INHERENT DANGER IN: “There is a inherent danger in being in the White House and being in the bubble. I mean, folks didn’t have any complaints about my leadership style when I was running around Iowa for a year.” So maybe you should be doing that, then. Also, you didn’t have a leadership style per se because you weren’t actually a, you know, leader yet.Or show us on the item in the (possibly NSFW) photo in this post.
WHAT THEY WERE ABLE TO DO: “And they got a pretty good look at me up close and personal, and they were able to lift the hood and kick the tires”. They did what you to you now? Show us on this Tonka truck where the Iowans touched you.
In other news to complicate the story we're getting on the election, "The conservative Blue Dogs lost half their members, while the Progressive Caucus remains near eighty." Was America trying to send a message to the Democrats?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
